Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@logilab.fr> wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:57:01 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>> 1. python{3}-foo which is arch all and follows the current naming
>convention
>> of foo being the name you import. It would depend on the arch any
>python-foo-
>> ext package.
>>
>all -> any package dependencies are often icky, if you want them to be
>strictly versioned. Probably not a showstopper, but something to be
>aware of.
Right now I'd just like to understand what is being proposed.
Scott K
Reply to: