Re: Possible Mass Bug Filing: String Exceptions Removed in Python 2.6
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 21:15, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:05:49PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 01:39, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
>> >> Please reply to debian-python with fix reports or reports of false
>> >> positives.
>
>> > Not quite either of these, but in a similar vein, I've filed bug #584833
>> > against gourmet with the patch from Ubuntu for this issue as part of regular
>> > due diligence on the Ubuntu side
>
>> thanks for that
>
>> > so gourmet should probably be exempted from the MBF.
>
>> but it seems it has more than what was fixed in -3 revision.
>
> Boh, you're right. :/ Sorry, I hadn't checked that the patch was
> comprehensive because the app's been working fine for me on python 2.6, so I
> guess these are all corner cases. I'll follow up on this (and yes, the
> suggestion to omit from the MBF is null and void)
yeah that's what I meant: I was reviewing the fixed/pending/done mails
against Jabuk's script esults executed minutes before and noticed this
package was still there; so yes, it is in the MBF. Sorry for having
been a bit too cryptic :)
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Reply to: