Twas brillig at 20:21:31 07.09.2009 UTC-07 when vorlon@debian.org did gyre and gimble: >> SL> They were part of the design that came out of the python >> SL> packaging BoF in DebConf 6 that you then proceeded to ignore >> SL> entirely. >> Is this design and rationale written down somewhere? It's hard to >> follow policy which contains completely opaque requirements. SL> No, it's pretty much bitrotted away by now Thanks to those who did not communicate ideas outside of the DC attendants. SL> thanks to people deciding to discard all the efforts of the session SL> in question Which were not documented. SL> and unilaterally implement helpers that don't do what was asked SL> for. You're not a dictator who has the rights to command what helpers to exist, especially if your favorite one is not backed by any written rationale. Single "why?" document would help to resolve situation much better than endless whining about "bad python-support developers". Just accept the facts that you've failed to communicate ideas behind policy, reevaluate situation and propose something that is constructive, this will be beneficial for all of us. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
pgpKyJnLCdLNV.pgp
Description: PGP signature