Re: Experimental Python packages
Neil Schemenauer <nas@debian.org> writes:
> python_2.1.1
> python1.5_1.5.2
> zope2.3.3
Why not python-1.5_1.5.2, zope-2.3.3 and similar binary packages? I
think this namenumber scheme is ugly and it looks strange.
name-version is more clear IMO.
> These create the following binary packages:
>
> python-base
> python-dev
> python-elisp
Why not python instead of python? I want to be able to "apt-get
install python" and "dpkg -p python". Then python could confilct with
python-base, and in that way force all old module packages that depend
on python-base to get updated to their new version that depend on
python (>= 1.5), python (<<1.6).
/Micce
--
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden +46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile)
[gpg key fingerprint = 387F A8DB DC2A 50E3 FE26 30C4 5793 29D3 C01B 2A22]
Reply to: