Re: python-2.1 for unstable?

To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: 24 May 2001 13:53:04 +0200
Message-id: <87k837gdzz.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <15116.60661.817148.705689@bolero> (Matthias Klose's message of "Thu, 24 May 2001 13:15:05 +0200 (MEST)")
References: <15113.24949.384198.356178@bolero> <990477318.24250.1.camel@debian> <20010521231930.A12823@53b.hoffleit.de> <87y9rnggca.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <15116.60661.817148.705689@bolero>

Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:

> Florian Weimer writes:
>  > This is probably correct, but it is completely irrelevant in our case.
>  > Some parts of Python 2.1 are still covered by the GPL-incompatible
>  > CNRI license, so Python 2.1 as a whole is not GPL compatible.
> 
> which parts exactly?

I think you have to ask the Python developers.  Answering this
question requires a huge amount of work (digging through CVS logs,
diffs, mailing list archives, personal mail folders, etc.).

Reply to:

References:
- python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Tom Cato Amundsen <tca@gnu.org>
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Gregor Hoffleit <gregor@hoffleit.de>
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Next by Date: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Previous by thread: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Next by thread: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread