Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
- From: Tom Cato Amundsen <tca@gnu.org>
- Date: 21 May 2001 22:35:15 +0200
- Message-id: <990477318.24250.1.camel@debian>
- In-reply-to: <15113.24949.384198.356178@bolero>
- References: <15113.24949.384198.356178@bolero>
On 21 May 2001 20:57:34 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I really would like to see 2.1 in the next Debian release. I'd like to
> ask Gregor (the maintainer) for an upload schedule, so that other
> maintainers can rely on this to get their packages ready for the next
> release as well. Are there still license issues which will be resolved
> in upcoming releases? Should we skip 2.1 and hope that 2.2 gets
I don't think 2.1 is much better than 2.0 when it comes to GPL
compatibility. But the
roumurs say that there will be a 2.1.1 release that is fixes this and a
few other bugs.
I think the new (2.1.1) license was blessed by rms... Sorry, I don't
remember where
I read this.
> released upstream before the woody freeze?
>
> Thanks, Matthias
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
Tom Cato Amundsen <tca@gnu.org>
GNU Solfege - free eartraining, http://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/
Reply to: