Re: python-2.1 for unstable?

To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:15:05 +0200 (MEST)
Message-id: <15116.60661.817148.705689@bolero>
In-reply-to: <87y9rnggca.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <15113.24949.384198.356178@bolero> <990477318.24250.1.camel@debian> <20010521231930.A12823@53b.hoffleit.de> <87y9rnggca.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>

Florian Weimer writes:
 > This is probably correct, but it is completely irrelevant in our case.
 > Some parts of Python 2.1 are still covered by the GPL-incompatible
 > CNRI license, so Python 2.1 as a whole is not GPL compatible.

which parts exactly?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>

References:
- python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Tom Cato Amundsen <tca@gnu.org>
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Gregor Hoffleit <gregor@hoffleit.de>
- Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>

Prev by Date: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Next by Date: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Previous by thread: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Next by thread: Re: python-2.1 for unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread