Hi there! On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:07:55 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > begin quotation from Luca Capello (in <[🔎] sa761yigfo9.fsf@gismo.pca.it>): >> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:40 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: >> > begin quotation from Luca Capello (in <[🔎] sa74necber2.fsf@gismo.pca.it>): >> >> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:15:00 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: >> >> > - We replace the events page with a link to a wiki page (I would be >> >> > willing to set up and sporadically maintain the wiki page). >> >> >> >> As from previous discussions, IMHO the Events page is something >> >> different than a wiki page: the former has .ics entries, it is a >> >> almost-static page and to me it some more official than any other *.d.o >> >> domain. >> > >> > I am quite aware of this. .ics might be created from a wiki page, too - >> > even though I am not sre how at tha moment. >> > >> > Moreover a static page for dynamic content is not a good idea in my eyes. >> >> I do not see the Events pages as 'dynamic content': you organize >> something, you announce it and it is added to those pages. For >> everything which is dynamic, there is the wiki, which is usually linked >> From the Events page: > > Well, events pop up at some point in time and are over at another. Thist is > dynamic in my eyes, even though it does not happen very fast. This is where we disagree: in my eyes, once is there, the content does not change and what is there is history. > The point > here is that the change is faster than our willingness to adapt the web > page to it. There are different factors other than willingness: time, first of all, then the fact that events@d.o receives 1 useful email out of 99 spam and finally also the fact that the Events team has to monitor way to many locations. >> > So, your option would be to leave the situation as it is? Or what is your >> > proposal? >> >> I do not have any proposal and any improvement will be fine: I have >> simply stated my opinion, at least to continue the discussion. > > Ok, an opinion it is. But given your voice change will not be possible at > the moment as I do not see a consensus emerging. And the status quo is not > acceptable to me. My voice is 1 out of 10 from the Events team, and considering that I am leaving the team it has even less weight. As usual in Debian, power to the people who do stuff. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature