begin quotation from Luca Capello (in <sa7hahudevw.fsf@gismo.pca.it>): > On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:07:55 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > > begin quotation from Luca Capello (in <sa761yigfo9.fsf@gismo.pca.it>): > >> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:40 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > >> > begin quotation from Luca Capello (in <sa74necber2.fsf@gismo.pca.it>): > >> >> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:15:00 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > >> >> > - We replace the events page with a link to a wiki page (I would be > >> >> > willing to set up and sporadically maintain the wiki page). > >> >> > >> >> As from previous discussions, IMHO the Events page is something > >> >> different than a wiki page: the former has .ics entries, it is a > >> >> almost-static page and to me it some more official than any other *.d.o > >> >> domain. > >> > > >> > I am quite aware of this. .ics might be created from a wiki page, too - > >> > even though I am not sre how at tha moment. > >> > > >> > Moreover a static page for dynamic content is not a good idea in my eyes. > >> > >> I do not see the Events pages as 'dynamic content': you organize > >> something, you announce it and it is added to those pages. For > >> everything which is dynamic, there is the wiki, which is usually linked > >> From the Events page: > > The point > > here is that the change is faster than our willingness to adapt the web > > page to it. > > There are different factors other than willingness: time, first of all, > then the fact that events@d.o receives 1 useful email out of 99 spam and > finally also the fact that the Events team has to monitor way to many > locations. This is part of willingness to me. In my case the missing willingness is to cope with debian www pages. > >> > So, your option would be to leave the situation as it is? Or what is your > >> > proposal? > >> > >> I do not have any proposal and any improvement will be fine: I have > >> simply stated my opinion, at least to continue the discussion. > > > > Ok, an opinion it is. But given your voice change will not be possible at > > the moment as I do not see a consensus emerging. And the status quo is not > > acceptable to me. > > My voice is 1 out of 10 from the Events team, and considering that I am > leaving the team it has even less weight. As usual in Debian, power to > the people who do stuff. Ok, so I take this over and do it my way... ;-) cu AW -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet) Arne Wichmann (aw@linux.de)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature