On 2010-11-23 09:00, Holger Levsen wrote:
What is wrong that I keep repeating? Sorry but I don't remember you intervening in these discussions once. Who knows, maybe explaining your disagreement could be as useful as name-calling. Are you saying the set of packages that will be released as squeeze is known? If so I bet the release team will be happy to know too.Hi, On Montag, 22. November 2010, Filipus Klutiero wrote:No, I was trying to explain that for either interpretation, 200 was wrong. The normal reading would mean 271, but the reading of "final squeeze" would mean 0 RC bugs (a very dull statistic). The set of packages that will be released as squeeze is unknown.This is wrong and you keep repeating it, just like the good troll you are.
At this point I would like to point you to what I already replied when that was stated.Why not suggest an alternative that expresses the idea in a way you prefer?At this point I won't express preferences. Anything valid that Alexander will like is fine.And at this point I like to express that it was already stated, that you please leave this project alone.