Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
Hi,
On 9/24/19 8:45 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Why would it be unacceptable that the whole of the archive be maintained
> in Git using Salsa? Wouldn't it be much nicer for everyone?
basically because sometimes it makes sense to have packages on github
(or gitlab, ...), close (or even within) upstream repositories.
While they could be mirrored to salsa, it wouldn't make sense, as this
would be a read only mirror.
Also salsa's CI runner is still missing resources, so right now it also
makes sense not to migrate everything there - travis is happily giving
resources out for free.
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: