On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 09:27 +0100, Matthias Hager wrote: > Chris Lamb has obviously been gaslighting, winding people up for > months in private and pretending he doesn't know anything It's only obvious if you accept Sam's narrative. As I said, when Sam selects a stories narrative an accurate portrayal of events has never been high on his list of priorities. So much so that people who were there usually don't recognise the event in the story. I say this as one of Sam's fellow Australian's who has been involved in open source for a couple of decades and has attended events on the receiving end of a few of his articles. In fact to me it has looked like Sam deliberately stirred things up by attributing false motivations to the people involved, making it seem it plausible by the selective planting of nuggets of truth here and there, possibly so he could wring out a few more stories of conflict and turmoil from the same source. But I'm sure that's can't be right as no ethical journalist would behave that way.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part