[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The proper place to announce GRs (was Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?))



Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:32:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced.
("Should", I suppose I'm arguing, not "must").
I think we don't need to name the place in the constitution. I don't
think we need a hard rule about where the announcement happens.

I do, however, think it would be good to announce all proposed GRs on
debian-devel-announce and debian-vote, with Reply-To to debian-vote.
This would ensure all DDs hear about every proposed GR. There's not
enough of them to cause a lot of d-d-a traffic. If the proposer of a
GR forgets to do that, the secretary or some other DD could do it for
them.
If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I
will announce that the GR process has been sarted on
debian-devel-announce.


Isn't the point of posting on debian-devel-announce to increase the visibility and liklihood of seconds in the first place?

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra


Reply to: