The proper place to announce GRs (was Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?))
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: The proper place to announce GRs (was Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?))
- From: Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:30:43 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20141013183043.GA29781@chew.redmars.org>
- In-reply-to: <CAKNHny8jefmHuHiecO_bnvncMOrQ-28zNd3Fe3sOCdAKHW3QXQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20141007120057.459ab43c@mydesq2.domain.cxm> <m2n.s.1XdguO-366611@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <21563.60534.190732.528749@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <17667995.ybzVghadep@gyllingar> <543BFC64.4050709@meetinghouse.net> <CAKNHny8jefmHuHiecO_bnvncMOrQ-28zNd3Fe3sOCdAKHW3QXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi -project,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> You do understand that we have procedured at Debian to handle stuff
> like GR proposals, right? And that procedure involves posting to
> debian-vote, so doing that was the right thing to do.
Whilst researching for a reply to a different post in this thread on -user (the
thread sadly spans at least three lists), I realised that the constitution
doesn't say where GRs should be announced, and I couldn't find any advice on
the subject in a scan over policy, either.
I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced. ("Should", I
suppose I'm arguing, not "must").
In this particular case I saw the GR thread on -project, rather than -vote,
iirc.
Unless I'm mistaken, a change to Constitution (to include a reference to where
GRs should be posted) would need to be achieved via GR.
Alternatively, we could document it as a "should" in policy, although there may
not yet be an appropriate section to do so.
Does anyone have strong feelings on this?
--
Jonathan Dowland
Reply to: