[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Code of Conduct violations handling process



On Wed, Sep 03 2014, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:

> [Manoj Srivastava, 2014-09-03]
>>         Is your position then that condes of conduct and enforcing
>>  harassment policies are a form of censorship? (I am congnizent that you

> no, if I'd think that, I'd retire already, no?

        I am glad to hear that.

>> > and more seriously, the day Debian will do censorship is the day I
>> > retire from the project.

>>         How do you suppose we keep the atmosphere from devolving back to
>>  the poisonous flame-fest days, and enforce various codes of conduct
>>  policies?  I have seen far too many tech conferences without codes of
>>  conduct devolve into misogynistic and occasionally racist
>>  experiences. The argument that codes of conduct are forms of censorship
>>  is frequently made, but, I am afraid, not very convincingly.

> my point is some people react out of proportion (and that's why I did as
> well, didn't you notice at least a bit of sarcasm in my mail?).

        I could not be sure.  Feeling and emotional nuances are hard to
 convey in email,and I certainly struggle with correctly judging peoples
 intent if they are at odds with what is expressed in writing.

        So, if there was a speaker guideline in play, and if the
 delegates determine that that was violated, I shall be disappointed if
 nothing was done due to the stature of the speaker.

> Some people want(ed) to codify in CoC other political correctness
> "things" that I don't agree with. I like our current CoC and I don't
> want to change it.

        Respect for others seems to be a part of our CoC, no?

        manoj
-- 
The trouble with eating Italian food is that five or six days later
you're hungry again. -- George Miller
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20  05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: