Russ Allbery wrote: > At the moment, I find the idea of other people discussing these issues and > any others that have arisen and coming up with a good plan of action while > I sit back and watch horribly appealing for some reason. :) I'm not sure > if now is the best time, or if we should wait until we've gotten to some > steady-state position on the init system debate and then start the > procedural discussions. I'll leave that to other people's discretion. I wouldn't want to do it now if it required the ctte change its process mid-stream, or if it somehow distracted the ctte from coming to a resolution. OTOH, if the ctte is still stuck in a procedural morass after the full 3-4 weeks it takes to pass a GR, it could be a lifeline that lets it decide on a better decision making procedure. Even if that ends up being "we decide by consensus and we have none re systemd". That's as far as I've gotten in thinking about this. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature