On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:38:46PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > .oO ( funny that this comes up now, given the same delegation text was > already used in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/10/msg00006.html and *nod* FWIW, the "job description" detailed in that delegation---which I believe is the first that has been done with the current text---didn't come out of the blue. It was discussed at length with the policy editors back then. AFAICT it was consensual between me and them at the time. This, of course, doesn't necessarily mean the text is bug-free or non-problematic wrt the Constitution. Bugs happen. But it is what we collectively believed to be a correct representation of the status quo back then and of the powers that should be delegated to the Policy editors. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature