Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> writes:
> This is all very well but I think de jure they aren't a delegated team,
> and the distinction is defined in the constitution. This is not
> trivially bypassable, because a delegated team is one who derives their
> powers from the DPL and the constitution limits the powers of the DPL.
I believe that deciding on the mechanisms and machinery whereby the
project as a whole will work out its technical policy (as opposed to
disputes over the contents of that policy itself) falls nicely under 5.1.4
and 5.1.9, particularly the latter.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>