Re: Code of Conduct: picking up
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Code of Conduct: picking up"):
> Op 05-11-13 19:47, Ian Jackson schreef:
> > I would suggest that the GR should explicitly say that the DPL is
> > empowered to make changes to the Code of Conduct according to the
> > usual process for a DPL decision.
> Hmm. I'm leaning towards this, but I'm not 100% sure yet. It should be
> safe (after all, the DPL is someone who, by definition, is supposed to
> be trusted by the community), but it feels a bit irky.
If the DPL does something silly, we have ways of stopping them.
I think doing it that way would serve the main purpose of having the
CoC be a GR, namely demonstrating widespread acceptance and giving the
document moral authority, but still retain the flexibility of fairly