Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes: ... > Nobody has suggested removing the mirror network. What's being > discussed is using a CDN for some .d.o services. That was certainly not clear from your original post. I certainly read you as suggesting that some services could be moved to third-party CDN(s), with an eye to moving ftp.debian.org there to, with the implication that the mirror network would then become mostly redundant. I would suggest that that's the scenario that is causing people to argue against you, so if that's not what you were suggesting, perhaps you should try to express your plans again to get the discussion closer to what you think you were suggesting. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
Attachment:
pgpkJi3AF6SBP.pgp
Description: PGP signature