Re: ditching the official use logo?
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:28:18PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > How about the attached patch?
> > Looks great to me. Calling it restricted is technically correct, and
> > well, that's the the best kind of correct.
> I second this (I am on the camp of "we need/should keep the restricted
> logo"). I consider this an acceptable compromise.
I second the patch (I was in the camp of "put the bottle logo in a museum".) As
Henrique wrote, the patch is an acceptable compromise.