On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:45:32PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > > That made me wonder whether Debian collects references to the research > > done on it somehow somewhere. > > There is one mentioned here: > http://wiki.debian.org/Statistics#Scientific_papers_with_statistics_about_Debian > > And some more here: > http://wiki.debian.org/research Several of the work done in the research group I'm a member of in Paris have directly had Debian packages and their relationships as a subject of study, or even proposed solutions for Debian Quality Assurance. A couple of publication listings are at: - http://upsilon.cc/~zack/research/publications/ - http://www.mancoosi.org/papers/ Note that not all of the papers you'll find there are Debian related, so someone needs to do some cherry picking. For the papers of which I'm co-author, I've just done so and this is a list of the corresponding DOIs or preprint: - http://upsilon.cc/~zack/research/publications/cbse2011-mpm.pdf (DOI not available yet) - http://upsilon.cc/~zack/research/publications/studia11-dh-ocaml.pdf (DOI not available yet) - 10.1016/j.scico.2010.11.001 - 10.1007/978-3-642-15579-6_40 - 10.1109/MSR.2010.5463277 - 10.1109/ESEM.2009.5316017 - 10.1007/978-3-642-14819-4_19 I haven't done the same for papers I'm not co-author of, because I don't have the DOIs handy. For all papers above you can find preprints at the first two links I've mentioned in this mail. > I'd encourage you to contribute to the research wiki page if you find > any new/old research. The debian-publicity folks can help with > publicising any new research that comes up. Please do, I think it's very valuable. At the same time, as a scholar in this field, I don't think it's feasible to imagine paper (co-)authors to actually maintain those pages. I've myself to already maintain that in several places (e.g. for periodic review of my work by the university and/or state) and I won't be particularly willing to do it in yet another place. You might want to encourage it a bit more by providing some automated submission interface (which of course will be SPAM prone ...). To be honest, it seems to me that the only way this could be kept current is if someone other than the authors will step up and maintain a "Debian Research Bibliography" from within Debian. We might also want to find an interesting place where to link this from www.d.o, as it might increase the visibility. As a last data point, several DebConf-s ago (<= 2007, at least), Benjamin Mako Hill held a BoF about research done on and around Debian. It was from all point of views (social sciences, computer science, etc.), but I'm pretty sure the BoF was based on some bibliography of his. You might want to check that with him. > Personally I feel that research without feedback to Debian is > suboptimal, we should be able to learn from studies of Debian and > change in positive ways as a result. Yes, but it should go both ways. I've been doing myself research which has an impact on Debian (the EDOS toolchain, apt-cudf now in experimental, etc.) and I can assure you that the overhead for scientists to have such an impact is enormous when compared to the usual scholar work-flow. I cannot imagine scholars with low degree of involvement in Debian (arguably, my own involvement in Debian is quite high) managing to have an impact on us. The entry barrier is very high for them. So if we, as in Debian, want to benefit from research outcomes, it should *also* be us reaching out to scholars and try to integrate their work. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature