Re: [DEP5] Format of Copyright header
Charles Plessy <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Thanks a lot for this change.
> I note that there is only one line-based list left, the Upstream-Contact
> field, which is optional.
> How about applying the same change to Upstream-Contact, and removing the
> line-based list syntax entirely ?
Line-based lists are not an invention of DEP-5 -- they're a standard field
type in Policy -- so I don't think there's a huge need to get rid of them.
They're a fairly natural structure for Upstream-Contact, which I don't
think poses the same problem.
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>