[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: On terminology

On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 07:21:08PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:14:03AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> >> Am I the only one who has trouble -and getting laughed at- whenever I
> >> try to explain these to potential contributors?

> >> Can we _at least_ rename the NM process to be indicative of what it
> >> is?

> > Seconded.
> OK, I see a lot of people seconding this (incl. the DPL) and noone
> objecting, but I'm not really sure what's the procedure (and the actions
> needed) to get this changed.

I haven't seen anyone propose a good name that it can be changed *to*. 
Shouldn't that be the first step?

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: