Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:14:03AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > > Can we _at least_ rename the NM process to be indicative of what it > > is? Seconded. > Speaking with various people about the ways they can join Debian, I've > had several time the feeling that our current (incoherent) naming is > quite confusing. It is nobody's fault, it has just grown this way due > to how our membership mechanisms evolved, but it's definitely time to > make the terminology more uniform. So what would be affected by changing the name? Which documents, which other parts of the process, etc.? -- \ “The fact of your own existence is the most astonishing fact | `\ you'll ever have to confront. Don't dare ever see your life as | _o__) boring, monotonous or joyless.” —Richard Dawkins, 2010-03-10 | Ben Finney
Attachment:
pgpg75ZJ9SUrL.pgp
Description: PGP signature