[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: On terminology



Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:

> On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:14:03AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> > Can we _at least_ rename the NM process to be indicative of what it
> > is?

Seconded.

> Speaking with various people about the ways they can join Debian, I've
> had several time the feeling that our current (incoherent) naming is
> quite confusing. It is nobody's fault, it has just grown this way due
> to how our membership mechanisms evolved, but it's definitely time to
> make the terminology more uniform.

So what would be affected by changing the name? Which documents, which
other parts of the process, etc.?

-- 
 \        “The fact of your own existence is the most astonishing fact |
  `\    you'll ever have to confront. Don't dare ever see your life as |
_o__)     boring, monotonous or joyless.” —Richard Dawkins, 2010-03-10 |
Ben Finney

Attachment: pgpMFjcthGm4S.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: