Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> writes: Yes, in practice, a two year cadence is more achievable for Debian, based on past performance, and that is a significant contributor to my feeling that the broader free software ecosystem could align around a two year cadence. Debian reflects many of the underlying patterns in the whole ecosystem. I think that's even more true if it were part of a broader collaboration with many distributions (not just Ubuntu). In other words, if we make the commitment, it becomes easier to achieve. On the other hand, if we demonstrate a spectacular inability to make a commitment, it gets much harder :-) Manoj, I would strongly support your call to have more distributions involved. This is not, to my mind, about Debian-Ubuntu, as much as it's about coaxing the whole ecosystem to embrace a cadence that in turn makes collaboration so much easier. I've already reached out to Novell SUSE, and had a blog scheduled for this week which would make an open call for others to participate in the summit that was envisaged for December where we look for opportunities to share common base versions. I've put that on hold, given the debate unfolding here, but still believe it's both achievable and beneficial not just to us (Debian and Ubuntu) but to many other groups in free software too. Mark |