Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
- From: Steve Langasek <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:06:44 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090801060644.GA3442@dario.dodds.net>
- Mail-followup-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <20090729010802.GA29421@melusine.alphascorpii.net> <20090730064541.GE29901@foghorn.stateful.de> <20090730071626.GC2911@torres.zugschlus.de> <20090730083746.GA11171@rivendell> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20090730172413.GC8602@dario.dodds.net> <email@example.com>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 04:31:56PM +0000, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2009-07-30, Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > You seem to have been operating under a misconception that the *majority* of
> > packages in Ubuntu have been touched wrt Debian. They have not - the vast
> > majority of packages in Ubuntu are unmodified Debian packages, as shown by
> > the graphs on the bottom of <https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html> and
> ><https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html> - which is for the best given the
> > relative number of developers working on each project.
> I don't think it holds true for main, though. Unless I'm misreading the
> graphs. Of course it applies to universe where Ubuntu is heavily relying
> on Debian to do the work.
Well, most of the 'local' packages on the graph for main are actually
language packs, so I don't think it makes much sense to count those anyway.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/