Re: DAM and NEW queues processing
On 25/06/09 at 12:29 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:58:22PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 23/06/09 at 22:35 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > > > I've been advocating people "too early" (i.e, I've advocated people so
> > > > that they could start NM, while in the meantime, I wouldn't have
> > > > advocated them for DM).
> > >
> > > Thank you for adding to other people's workload sifting through
> > > applicants who aren't yet ready.
> >
> > Who did I advocate who wasn't ready?
>
> You said so yourself above.
No.
I said that I considered some people ready to start NM, because I was
sure that they would be perfectly ready to be a DD by the end of the NM
process (i.e a year and a half later, basically), and that they would be
good NM applicants (modulo the usual delays and motivation problems). In
the same time, I wouldn't have advocated them immediately for DM,
because they could still use some reviewing for a while. That's the
difference between potential and skills, I think.
Now, I checked, and none of the people I advocated (only 2 of them, but
the above applied to both of them, I think) were put on hold before
being assigned an AM. So apparently front desk agrees with my view, and
maybe it's just that I'm having too high standards for DM.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: