On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:29:20PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> What you miss is that I move all problematic candidates to DAM with
> the comment "I'm not entirely happy, but its your job to decide..."
OK, then what I'm proposing is to identify one single entity where the
decision is taken. Either is FD or is DAM.
You are rightful in asking redundancy, but you can have it within
_the_ entity (e.g., two FD members to independently review the
mailboxes, if you feel its needed).
The current work-flow (as I understand it, I might be wrong in that of
course) looks like very sub-optimal: you have sometimes redundancy
(for the "problematic" cases) and other times you have it not; also
the decision is split among two entities, with no clear responsibles.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature