On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Leo costela Antunes wrote: > Or implementing something like the suggestion from Michael Hanke[0], > making the process open, but not immediate. No, it is not enough. The public visibility of changes on a wiki does not grant that every single page do not get rotten over time. Are you following closely the addition to the DM keyring? I'm not. I wouldn't be doing that in the long run even if I knew that it is a collective responsibility. And sooner or later it will happen that a change won't be looked at thoroughly by anybody. I don't want to get there. Cheers. PS .oO( <joke> where are all the people which were shouting at collaborative maintenance because "nobody feels responsible" when I need them </joke> ) :-) -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è sempre /oo\ All one has to do is hit the right uno zaino -- A.Bergonzoni \__/ keys at the right time -- J.S.Bach
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature