On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> Or implementing something like the suggestion from Michael Hanke[0],
> making the process open, but not immediate.
No, it is not enough.
The public visibility of changes on a wiki does not grant that every
single page do not get rotten over time.
Are you following closely the addition to the DM keyring? I'm not. I
wouldn't be doing that in the long run even if I knew that it is a
collective responsibility. And sooner or later it will happen that a
change won't be looked at thoroughly by anybody.
I don't want to get there.
Cheers.
PS .oO( <joke> where are all the people which were shouting at
collaborative maintenance because "nobody feels responsible"
when I need them </joke> ) :-)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è sempre /oo\ All one has to do is hit the right
uno zaino -- A.Bergonzoni \__/ keys at the right time -- J.S.Bach
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature