[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Developer Status

pe, 2008-10-24 kello 16:56 +0200, Wouter Verhelst kirjoitti:
> If you insist. Note that I'll vote against it -- I've never liked
> procedures whose sole purpose is to change procedures.

For what it's worth, as one of the three people who suggested DEP in the
first place, I would be unhappy to see it made mandatory, and would vote
against a GR suggesting it.

As far as I care, DEP should be a tool, for those who wish to use it.

Reply to: