[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Developer Status

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 03:25:57PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 15:17 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:32:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > We have a process for this kind of changes, it’s call DEPs. Why didn’t
> > > you start this discussion as a DEP instead?
> > 
> > Because Debian is not Python? AFAIK there's no *requirement* to make
> > proposals in any particular way.
> I thought the project was mature enough to use appropriate processes
> even when they are not written in stone, but if you really want to, I
> can write a constitutional amendment formalizing DEPs.

If you insist. Note that I'll vote against it -- I've never liked
procedures whose sole purpose is to change procedures.

You can be unhappy about this particular proposal, but that has nothing
to do with whether or not it is a DEP.

<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
  -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22

Reply to: