Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:18:30PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > * Making debian/copyright be machine parseable.
> > * Agreeing upon a meta-package name or virtual package name.
>
> These sorts of issues are already tracked with the BTS, for instance when
> they're dealt with by the tech-ctte or -policy.
Aside: where is "Making debian/copyright be machine parseable" in BTS?
Where would it go?
It's a good point that much of this could be done in the BTS,
but maybe it's worth a DEP explaining how to map DEPs onto BTS.
Or maybe it's perverting the BTS. I dunno. Sounds good though.
Thanks,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: