Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Assuming that the number of DEPs will be significant, I think it would
> be a good idea to separate ACCEPTED DEPs into two groups, namely
> "historical" which nobody needs to read, because their text is included
> in some authorative document (policy, devref, whatever) and "current",
> which may be useful to read because they aren't included anywhere (DEP0
> will probably stay there, for example).
So long as devref revisions don't go through a public discussion process on
debian-policy or a similar general-audience list, I don't think inclusion in
devref is a reason to treat DEPs as "historical".
Otherwise, it seems reasonable to me.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/