On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 05:19:27PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:19:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > The biggest decisions need to be publicly documented however. I don't > > think we've clearly drawn the line here. I'm also unsure if it's important > > to have a clear line here. We can just let the ctte draw the line where > > it's appropriate given that any communication concerning the ctte should > > ideally be archived on master.d.o just like other aliases are archived > > there (press@d.o, secretary@d.o, etc.) and that DD should be able to > > consult them. > > I was going to suggest DDs being able to read it, exactly like that, > but I did get a vibe from Bdale and others that even that would be > too much exposure. > > I'm not sure, someone should elaborate if they disagree. I think that the internal discussions should be kept private to the soc-ctte at least as long as no decision is made. As decisions made by the comitee will probably quite often involve social behaviour of DDs I think it's problematic if all DDs can read the internal discussions of the comitee members. I believe that the comitee members should be able to discussion various options without the fear that something could be publicized (probably resulting in a flamewar) before even a discussion in the comitee is made. After a decision is made I think it's less problematic to make the discussion available to all DDs. But still there is the problem, that offending behaviour would be exposed to all DDs. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
Attachment:
pgp6ixcPOfZS2.pgp
Description: PGP signature