Re: Social committee proposal
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Andreas Barth wrote:
I think it would be better if the committee is re-elected from the
developers at large - perhaps half of their size
I see no chance to define half of their size precisely. It immediately
opens a lot of question. One of these questions is "Which half?".
So either re-electing all or nobody is an option.
every years for a two
years time (and doing the elections at the same time as the DPL)?
I think only voting in he same ballot will find wide acceptance amongst
the DDs (provided that devotee is able to process to different ballots
in one mail).
BTW, I think the leader should not be a member of the soc-ctte.
So in case a member of the soc-ctte is elected as leader somebody
else has to step in. For simplification of voting process I think
the next highest ranked for the soc-ctte should become a member
instead somebody who won the leader election.
While I'm not convinced that the soc-ctte has really to be
reelected on a regular basis (read: I'm undecided between Ian's
and Josip's proposal concerning this point) we would have to
find a method to substitute a soc-ctte member that might have
become leader in any other way if we do no regular elections.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: