Re: Developers vs Uploaders
Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org> wrote:
> Debian Vote 2006-1 -- I don't want to become a part of the group of
> people who were responsible for classifying the GFDL as "non-free".
Not even RMS claims the FDL is a free software licence:
"I am not sure if the GFDL is a free software license, but I don't
think the question matters."
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg01221.html
> [...] (Or find a new sponsor for packages of these
> Emacs add-on software programs, which might be difficult, given how
> despiriting the result of 2006-1 was for many Emacs users and
> developers.)
Huh? Many Emacs users want uneditable software in debian? Wow!
Regards,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: