Re: Bug#419642: New List: debian-infrastructure
* Raphael Hertzog <firstname.lastname@example.org> [070417 14:10]:
> Like Frans, I wonder why another list is needed. debian-devel-announce is
> OK from my point of view. The day where it's cluttered with announces of
> downtime, we can probably reconsider the question.
Let's have a look...
> > . alpha buildd is moving, downtime expected
> > . ftp-master moved to new bandwidth donator
> > . New sparc porting machine added to the network
That's mostly interesting for developers, and could be send to d-d-a.
> > . IPv6 available for security servers
> > . volatile archive moving, down for one day
> > . backports now supports packages for etch and sarge
That's interesting for our users, too. I don't know, why it should be
"hidden" on d-d-a.
If it's planed a bit ahead it could have been added to the dwn; IMHO at
least Ipv6 and backports could have been send to -news; while I don't
think volatile moving is something which should be send to news.
> I don't see why this couldn't be on d-d-a right now. :)
I partly agree ;)