On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:59:15PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> 1) When do developers need to implement social stances or policies?
> Can you give an example of the kinds of things the constitution
> may be talking about here?
While copying and pasting :) I was actually puzzled at the amount of
examples that were cited for the technical committee. I admit I don't have
any so straightforward examples, but then, it was pretty late when I wrote
that.
I'll have to ponder on it before suggesting an example, because it would
have to be worthy of being cemented into the constitution :)
> 2) What happens if only some of the paticipants in a social, umm,
> tussle, want to submit the affair to the soc ctte? Once referred,
> are all other parties now subject to the soc ctte rule?
Hm. I have no idea. What happens in the case of the technical committee?
I don't think I changed anything with regard to issue scope.
> 3) When a developer is over ruled on a technical matter, the tech
> ctte can not force a developer to do something they do not want to
> do (the developer can't stop other people from doing the task --
> no active work against, etc). Do similar clauses apply to the soc
> ctte?
Yeah, but this is governed by the same general rules section, 2.1.1.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.