Hi Steve, On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:33:15 +0000 Steve Kemp <skx@debian.org> wrote: [...] > The suggestion wasn't to remove the addresses, but to "mask" them. > That would still allow you to lookup the sender addresses if you > wished. eg "foo@example.com" -> "foo at com.example". Recently we had this thread about public emails in Debian lists/BTS: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/08/msg00123.html and Paul sent this article as a suggestion to understand why we don't have to mask them: http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful If you agree, consider using bogofilter, I've used it (client-side) with almost 100% of efficiency against spams - great performance, also. []'s -- Tiago Bortoletto Vaz 0xA504FECA - http://pgp.mit.edu http://tiagovaz.org "É preciso não ter medo, é preciso ter a coragem de dizer." Rondó da Liberdade, Carlos Marighella
Attachment:
pgpOtAwWANmIx.pgp
Description: PGP signature