Re: possible solution for "open source"-"closed source"-problem?
On 2006-11-22, Hans-Georg Bork wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:51 +0000, Oleg Verych wrote:
>> On 2006-11-22, Johann Horwath wrote:
>> > Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
>> > From: "Johann Horwath" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.project
>> > Subject: possible solution for "open source"-"closed source"-problem?
>> > Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:17:17 +0100
>> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3D3.1 required=3D4.0 tests=3DBAYES_95,MDO_DATI=
> NG2 autolearn=3Dno version=3D3.0.3
>> > hello,
>> > couldn't this be a solution for the big problem open/closed-source:
>> > the system should be basically only be open-source.
>> I didn't read further.
> but you expect that your email about DFSG is read? If so, get the
> original mail and read further; if not, keep using Micro$oft.
Thank you very much.
BTW, my DFSG e-mail here (with added ref. e-mail) asks for ideas. If you
have only this one. Thank you very much.