Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:22:19PM -0400, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> /tset/LSB.os/procenv/nice/T.nice 9 FAIL
> 10|866 /tset/LSB.os/procenv/nice/T.nice 22:59:40|TC Start, scenario ref 872-0
> 15|866 3.6-lite 9|TCM Start
> 400|866 9 1 22:59:40|IC Start
> 200|866 9 22:59:40|TP Start
> 520|866 9 00008759 1 1|nice(-1) did not return expected values
> 520|866 9 00008759 1 2|ERRNO VALUES: expected: 1 (EPERM), observed: 0 (NO ERROR)220|866 9 1 22:59:40|FAIL
> 410|866 9 1 22:59:40|IC End
> 80|866 0 22:59:41|TC End, scenario ref 872-0
> The nice() issue is a fairly straightforward attempt by the test process
> to increase its own priority by calling nice(-1), which appears to be
> succeeding. This has the potential to be a security issue.
Sorry, this one at least is bug #388431 in pam, which I hope to get taken
care of tonight.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: