Re: LSB 3.1 status for etch
* Jeff Licquia (firstname.lastname@example.org) [061006 22:57]:
> On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:00 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Is etch now LSB compliant? Is it time to update policy to specify LSB
> > 3.1 instead of 1.3?
> I won't comment on the policy decision except to say that I'd love to
> see that happen.
> As for LSB compliance, etch i386 and amd64, at least, have been tested
> to be LSB compliant. I'm currently in the process of re-running tests,
> which will include ia64 and powerpc.
> I'm fairly sure that, should the policy be amended in this way, any
> issues that come up should be fairly easy to resolve at this point.
I'm quite sure as well, but I need a few hours to write some things up
Jeff, please continue with your tests.