Re: Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit martin f krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > also sprach Henning Makholm <email@example.com> [2006.08.29.2310 +0200]:
> >> July 6 - bug goes public through upstream's BTS, Debian bug filed
> >> July 21 - fixed in sarge, DSA released
> > I know this is a ridiculous time span, but it's better than nothing.
> Certainly it's better than nothing. My point was merely that there is
> plenty of window for opensourcefactory.com to do _better_, and if they
> actually manage to, they do get the moral right to brag about it.
The question is: Do they?
Have you ever noticed that "General Public Licence" contains the word "Pub"?