On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:23:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=apache2 > > speaks for itself. RC bugs, with patches, for more than a year (oh > yeah). > > not to mention that apache2.2 (fixing many problems I'm told) has been > released in january (so it's not really cutting edge anymore, and I've > not seen the experimental packages either). IIRC there was still a problem with webdav or something like that (I cannot remember what was exactly the problem though). > apache[12] maintenance in debian is quite a shame in its current state > IMHO. And I just wanna add that all people who tried to reach the "apache team" see their messages to fall in a semi-blackhole (since Adam answered sometimes). To my point of view, the Debian apache status is _unknown_ since more than 6 months. I already asked to help or at least to see a copy of their work/sources to help, never get an answer. So, that's a clear example where the team maintenance can be as useless as letting only one people maintaining a package. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature