Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
Hi Manoj!
You wrote:
> + Traditionally, SPI was the sole organization authorized to hold
> + property and monies for the Debian Project. SPI was created in
> + the U.S. to hold money in trust there.
I'm wondering about this part. It seems to me like just a historic
overview of the old situation, which IMO does not belong in the
constitution.
> SPI and Debian are separate organisations who share some
> goals. Debian is grateful for the legal support framework offered
> by SPI. Debian's Developers are eligible for contributing
> membership in SPI by virtue of their status as Developers.
I don't think it makes sense that the Debian constitution determines who
can become a member of SPI. That is something that should be (and
probably is) described in SPI's bylaws.
--
Kind regards,
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| bas@o2w.nl, bas@debian.org | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: