On Monday 15 May 2006 06:18, Anthony Towns wrote: > It means that if you wish to continue maintaining them, you need to do > so independently of the Debian Install System Team, which is listed as > the current maintainer, and of which you are no longer a member. If you > wish to consult with your co-maintainers for those packages (Matt Kraai > and Stephen R Marenka for nobootloader, and Cajus Pollmeier for > partman-prep) and setup a new source control repository, that's > entirely appropriate. [...] > You're no longer a member of the d-i team; if they wish to keep those > packages' source in their subversion repository, it doesn't matter to > you at all. If they wish to maintain a fork compared to your packages, > that's fine too. If other members of the d-i team wish to maintain it > in your stead, they probably will be expected to justify that change as > a package hijack, depending on what your co-maintainers think of the > situation. I actually do not agree with these statements for the reasons outlined in: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366938;msg=50
Attachment:
pgpELiviMDWUP.pgp
Description: PGP signature