Christian Perrier wrote on 10/05/2006 07:00: >>If there are no strong objections in -project, I'm opened to suggestions >>about the Right Way to handle the further life of this proposal, to >>make it alittle bit more "official": >> >>-conclude it and post in -devel-announce...:-) >> >>-make the discussion wider in -devel and continue it there > > Well, I think we should come up with this now. > > The discussion core is clearly "suite vs branch". > > I have to confess that I'm hardly balancing between both. Filipus > developed an interesting and well argumented explanation to push > "branch" and I find it convincing...at least as convincing as > "pro-suite" arguments. > > So, unless someone else brings more arguments here, I'll summarize > again, crosspost to -devel and try to have the discussion there focus > on "suite vs branch" Though AJ is correct in saying that "suite" is by several tools in Debian (apt-utils and dak he mentioned - I don't know about their use of suite - as well as reprepro), I think that from a non-native-english user perspective, "branch" is easier to grasp. regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature