Re: Reforming the NM process
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 15:07 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 4/11/06, Benjamin Mesing <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > Unless you are not planning to have long term "second class
> > > developers"
> > Make this: Unless you are planning to have long term "second class
> > developers"
> No, no, no. Give someone the rights to vote or upload something for
> Debian isn't consider him "second class developer",
This was not intended as a rant. It might be useful to have different
types of participants with different access rights. I was merely
arguing, that I think it is not worth the effort to do this for people
in NM, which they should leave sooner or later (rather sooner than
If it is implemented as a long term membership (like, e.g. a doc-member
who has no packaging rights) that's a different issue.
Sorry that I was unclear about this.
Please do not send any email to firstname.lastname@example.org -- all email not
originating from the mailing list will be deleted. Use the reply to