Re: documentation x executable code
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 07:14:55AM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:03:49PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > Indeed. But not everyone agrees with your opinion that invariant sections
> > are trivialities.
>
> Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> wrote:
> > well, that just makes them wrong. and if they're obsessive about it, zealots.
>
> So your opinion is the only valid opinion? Well then, I guess the
> argument's over! You're obviously correct.
>
> Hey, why don't we stop wasting time by discussing anything at all? We
> can nuke all the Debian mailing lists and stop using the IRC channels.
> Any time we need to make a decision, we can just ask Craig.
>
> Even better, we can do away with DPL elections and the entire voting
> process. Debian's going to operate much more smoothly and, more
> importantly, correctly under this new regime.
right. even after 6 days you can't come up with any answer to over 70 lines
of argument in that message, so you retreat to the position of a coward and a
cretin - delete all but one flippant throw-away line and make a stupid
ad-hominem attack based on that.
congratulations! you've just proved you're every bit as lame as the zealots.
craig
PS: and, frankly, my opinion is worth a lot more than the opinions of lamers,
zealots, and cretins. i, at least, back up my opinions with evidence and
reasoning.
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au> (part time cyborg)
Reply to: